banner

andelman.com

   
   

  Andelman.com 
|

  Mr. Media  
|

  Rachel 
|

  Big Black Spider 
|

 Articles 

Bob Andelman

Bio


Hotbot Search
  "By Bob Andelman"  

Northern Light Search
  "By Bob Andelman"  

Guru.com
Hiring Information
  for Bob Andelman
 

Order Books
By Bob Andelman


 ARTICLES
 Latest Work
Profiles
Retail
First Person
Murder, I Wrote
Real Estate
Tampa Bay
Meetings
Radio
Business
Sports


BOOKS
 Reviews 

The Corporate Athlete
(Hardcover)

The Corporate Athlete
(Paperback; Jan. 2001)

The Corporate Athlete
(Audiotape)

The Corporate Athlete
(Official Web Site)

The Profit Zone

Built From Scratch
(Hardcover)

Built From Scratch
(Official Web Site)

Mean Business
(Paperback)

Mean Business
(Hardcover)

Mean Business
(Audiotape)

Bankers as Brokers

Stadium For Rent
(Paperback)

Stadium For Rent
(Online)

Why Men Watch Football  

Why Men Watch Football
(Online Soon!)

Big Black Spider
With the
Orange Orange Eyes
(A Story for Kids!) 



Mr. Media Archives  
The Latest  
1998  
1997  
1996  
1995  
1994  

More Andelmans  
 Mimi  
Rachel Photos  

Write To Us!  
Bob
Mimi
Rachel

Hitometer
(Since Oct. 7, 1999)

   

Oil Spill

Could a Valdez Type Accident

Ruin Tampa Bay?

By Bob Andelman

 

(Originally written in May 1989 for the Maddux Report, this won a Florida Magazine Award.)

 

A gallon of oil, when it hits water, looks like 50 gallons. Blood has the same quality -- a cut on the hand can look vicious.

That's why, when the oil tanker Exxon Valdez ran aground in Alaska's pristine Prince William Sound, rupturing its storage tanks and releasing more than 10.9 million gallons of crude oil into frigid high seas, it looked worse than all the bloodiest horror movies ever filmed . And it was.

Black goo spread across miles of open water, blanketing beaches, rocks and anything that it came in contact with. Birds that depend on the ocean for food were covered with sticky oil and ate contaminated prey. Fish couldn't breathe because the stuff clogged their gills. More than 11,640 birds and 607 sea otters -- 20 tons of animals in all -- have been eradicated by the crude.

The aftermath for the Exxon Corporation, which owns the tanker in question, was equally messy. An estimated two score of lawsuits -- including a $2 billion class action suit -- were filed against it within 60 days; others are in the works. More than 18,000 consumers have cut up their Exxon credit cards and returned them to the company, some symbolically drenched in oil. The company wrote off $30 million in first quarter earnings because of the accident. Anti-Exxon publicity gets worse as cleanup efforts drag on and horrifying descriptions of the affect of the oil on wildlife continue.

If that sounds horrifying, it is. What may be worse is that there isn't an oil company, port authority, government official or environmentalist who can deny the possibility of a devastating oil spill occurring in Tampa Bay. And frankly, the idea scares the hell out of all of them.

"I think we've generally been very, very lucky," says University of South Florida marine biologist Joseph L. Simon. "Damn lucky. We don't take all the precautions we can. It's greed. We're playing risk-assessment games. I don't consider these to be science problems. I consider this a political problem. WE know what's going to happen if you dump acid into the bay. We know because we've had plenty of opportunity to study these spills because of Gardinier. It's sort of like a hurricane is coming. It's not a matter of if, but when. We know at some point in time there's going to be a major disaster."

Consider these opportunities for calamity:

* Oil is the number one import category at both Port Manatee and Port of Tampa. Almost every day, an oil-bearing ship enters Tampa Bay.

* The Belcher 101, carrying oil from Coastal Corp.'s Texas and Alabama refineries to Manatee, can carry 9.2 million gallons of petroleum. The Exxon Valdez lost 10.9 million gallons in Prince William Sound.

* The Florida Power Bartow generating plant at Weedon Island State Preserve in St. Petersburg and FPL's Manatee plant are oil burners, relying on tankers and barges to supply them with millions of barrels a month. The Bartow plant has two docking areas, one to supply the plant, the other to feed a 31-mile oil pipeline to the Anclote power plant in Tarpon Springs. The Manatee plant also relies on a pipeline, this one 14 miles long, from Port of Tampa. Both represent an uneasy alliance of man's need and mother's nature. One big spill would instantly wipe out extensive mangrove and marsh areas.

* Two months ago, two tankers full of oil brushed each other in Tampa Bay, according to one source. It caused a major panic but nothing happened.

* Harbor pilots say the new Sunshine Skyway Bridge will not be an improvement to navigation as long as the crumbling old bridges remain beside it, continuing the same hazards of the past. "The likelihood of hitting the bridge is not that great," says Capt. John C. Timmel, a member of the Tampa Bay Pilots Association. "But neither was the Valdez." He says the old bridge is a potential hazard that need not exist.

* Archaic tide and currents charts being used by pilots put tankers at risk. Since they need "X" amount of water to bring heavy ships into port and accurate information is spotty, captains are literally dragging the bottoms of their tankers along the bottom of the bay.

One marine expert says overall conditions "are like U.S. 19 only out in the big blue sea."

Tampa Bay may not be a crude oil refining or processing destination like Alaska. But Port Manatee alone sees one enormous tanker weekly and petroleum barges daily carrying refined oil products ranging from jet fuel to gasoline and bunker fuel. (Bunker fuel, used to power tankers themselves, is most akin to crude in its thick, gooey texture.) Petroleum, in all its forms, is very important to Tampa Bay ports. It is a high revenue bulk commodity that helps fund other activities that enable ports to grow.

What would a million gallons of oil look like in Tampa Bay? Well, you wouldn't miss seeing it.

"A million gallons? Oh, man," says Pat Rennert, owner of A&A Coastal, which specializes in mopping up spills. "I can't even describe the mess we'd have. It'd go everywhere. Bradenton, St. Petersburg, Tampa -- all the way to Hooker's Point. The whole Tampa Bay. Oh, wow."

Rennert says it costs about $12 to clean up a gallon of oil on the water. That includes barges with vacuum trucks at $650 an hour, skimmers at $550 an hour, boom rental at $1 per foot per day, disposal fees of $20,000 and skilled laborers earning $19 an hour. A million gallon spill would cost at least $12 million to clean up.

If a catastrophic spill should occur here, experts say it would not be as difficult to deal with and clean as Prince William Sound, but the environmental aftermath could be just as deadly -- in proportion -- to the Alaskan disaster.

Potential for Disaster

First of all, Exxon is not currently importing fuels to either Port Manatee or Port of Tampa although it has in years past.

There are major differences between the port uses of Tampa Bay and Prince William Sound in Alaska which lower the comparative risk of spill here. Most important is that the Valdez port handles only oil. While oil is the predominant import by category at both Tampa and Manatee, the ports here also handle phosphate, scrap metal, newsprint, produce and other commercial items.

"They (Valdez) are the number four port in total tonnage and all of their tonnage is petroleum," says Nancy Schubert, director of public and government relations for the Tampa Port Authority. In 1987, only New Orleans, New York City and Houston had more combined tonnage; Tampa ranked ninth. "(Valdez) had no foreign exports and their domestic exports were 101 million tons. Last year we moved 51 million tons. (Only) 11.7 million tons is oil. We are not as dependent on petroleum. It's just not the same skew. The likelihood (of a spill) is not as high."

On the other hand, Prince William Sound doesn't have a Sunshine Skyway Bridge marking the only channel of entry and exit through it. The mouth of Tampa Bay has not one, not two, but three oil ports -- Tampa, Manatee and Weedon Island -- and three bridges, creating six times the opportunity for mishaps.

When one of the Skyway Bridge spans was hit by a freighter several years ago and toppled over, ships were backed up in and out of Tampa Bay for at least 10 days. The channel was not safe to navigate.

"The same navigational hazards that existed (before the new bridge was built) still exist because the old Skyway Bridge has not been demolished," according to Jan Platt Hillsborough County Commissioner Jan Platt and chairperson of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council's Agency on Bay Management. "We (the Agency on Bay Management, which she chairs) have taken a position to eliminate that hazard. There were many safeguards built into the new Skyway but they're to no advantage because the old Skyway is still there."

Cathy Palmer, spokesperson for District One of the Florida Department of Transportation, says that while the Skyway has been kicked around in the DOT's financial crisis, the high-rise portions of the old bridge spans are scheduled to be demolished in the 1990-91 fiscal year. The low-rise at both ends will eventually be reconditioned into two long fishing piers.

Removing the old bridge is not enough. Harbor pilots want updated tide and currents information. The last survey was done over 20 years ago for one month, compared to the modern six month standard for similar surveys.

"A NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) survey showed the charts were off," says Capt. John Timmel. "We've for years known what is predicted and what actually happens is rarely the same."

One solution under discussion is a $150,000 electronic tide sensor which could transmit simultaneous information to ships at sea about prevailing conditions. Charleston and the Chesapeake Bay have such equipment currently in operation.

Tampa Bay is the gateway for petroleum products to central Florida. Tankers docking at Port Manatee and the Port of Tampa supply trucks and pipelines delivering kerosene, jet fuel, gasoline, asphalt, liquid bulk or bunker fuel to destinations east to Orlando, south to Fort Myers and north to Crystal River. Florida Power receives 1 million barrels (equal to 42 million gallons) of oil every month at its Weedon Island plant by 10-20 barges and/or tanker.

"What tends to increase the likelihood of (an accident) in Tampa Bay is that as the population increases, the demand for toxic (products) increases exponentially. That's good for the economy, right?" wonders USF Professor Simon.

A GATX Terminals Corp. storage tank at Port of Tampa leaked 32,000 gallons of phosphoric acid into Hillsborough Bay in May. GATX was lucky; despite the accident, it had an emergency plan in place that worked well to immediately clean and minimize the effects of the acid spill.

"We really don't view any spill as minor. The fact that it happens is significant," says George Lowman, director of communications for Chicago-based GATX Corp., which operates GATX Terminals Corp. at Port Manatee, Port of Tampa (where it has 41 tanks, ranging in capacity from 6,500 gallons to 120,000 barrels) and 28 other ports around the world. GATX -- which describes itself as the largest storage company in North America and has $2.6 billion in assets -- operates the oil pipeline to Orlando, which carries jet fuel, heating oil and gasoline.

Another big oil handler, operating out of Port Manatee with 1.6 million barrel capacity, is Houston-based Coastal Corp., which owns Belcher Oil and 154 Coastal/Joy gas stations across Florida. Coastal claims to be the largest seller and mover of oil in Florida. The company had $8.2 billion in operating revenues in 1988. Director of Public Relations Wellington Osterloh knows the harsh realities of working within the fragility of the environment.

"We get tarred and feathered every now and then by a manatee environmental group," he says, less defensive than consigned to his fate. "We move something like 750,000 barrels a day. That represents about five percent of the entire United States needs for refined products a day. We've been in Florida for 65 years. Belcher paved the first street in Miami with asphalt."

Like GATX, Coastal says it has its own equipment and plans to deal with any critical eventuality. "I know you have a pristine area over there," says Osterloh.

"Companies like GATX that move products that can cause environmental damage have to be particularly sensitive to an area like Tampa Bay," says Lowman.

Maybe so. But Jan Platt thinks there needs to be stringent state and/or federal regulation and inspection of facilities such as GATX's, Gardinier's and others. "It's my understanding that it's self-monitoring by the corporations and the regulatory agencies," she says. "That's a major flaw in the process."

"We have operated safely for 20 years," says Port Manatee's Steve Tyndal. "But that is not to say (an accident) couldn't happen. The larger question is, suppose it does happen -- what do we do? Do we stop importing oil because we had an accident? Florida is in a tragically unique position. It is totally reliant on imported fuels. We're the fastest growing state in the nation. We've got to fuel the autos and industry that attract people."

Governmental bodies -- from the federal to the local level -- are taking a fresh look and making noises about the way oil and other toxic substances are imported and handled. Business can't help but listen and pay attention. The chances of an accident may be one in a million, but Alaska was on the short end of that draw.

"The Valdez has given us a 'Hey, that could happen here' outlook," says Peter Clark, principal environmental planner for the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. "If we don't learn from our past mistakes, we're destined to do them again. It's important to use these past mistakes and resolve them before they occur here."

Discerning the Culprit

A port official who prefers not to be identified claims that 50 percent of all spills are probably man-made because a captain does something he shouldn't do.

Certainly that has been the accusation directed against the Exxon Valdez, where the Capt. Joseph Hazelwood has been accused of drinking on the job. That left an experienced third mate to make steering decisions he wasn't licensed or qualified to carry out.

It's always going be human error that causes spills, says USF's Joe Simon. "You can't program that out of the system," he says. "There's always going to be accidents -- that's what the word means."

Human foible is blamed for the spill near Ruskin at Port Sutton by the Howard Starr on Oct. 10, 1979. "That was approximately 20,000 gallons of bunker oil," according to Pat Rennert, whose A&A Coastal worked on the cleanup operation. "It was a foreign vessel. The crew -- being so used to doing this overseas -- they didn't think anything of discharging 20,000 gallons into the sea.

"It was something like Alaska," he says. "(Oil) was scattered throughout the beaches, five to six inches deep, some places up to a foot deep. It was heavy, thick oil. A lot of birds and fish were killed. It was a long, drawn-out process to retrieve the oil. We had vac (short for vacuum) trucks going day and night."

So messy and complicated was the spill that it cost $700,000 to clean up. By contrast, however, three months after the Exxon Valdez spill, Exxon reportedly had spent $200 million on the cleanup.

Rennert will never forget the sights and sounds of all that oil.

"Fish would come up to the surface," he says, "get oil on them and then they couldn't breathe through their gills. They'd just flop around until they died. When that oil hit the mangroves, it automatically killed them. They can't withstand the shock."

There are a number of ways to deal with spills while they are on the water. Most common -- the court of first resort -- is the "boom." The term is misleading but the method is usually effective. Teams of boats surround floating oil with a curtain that corrals the toxic mess. They then will tow the boom into port or somewhere the fuel can be vacuumed off the water.

A&A Coastal has several thousand feet of oil spill boom on hand for emergencies. GATX and Coastal have supplies of their own; Florida Power has 1,000 feet of boom and two work boats; other oil companies at Tampa Bay ports may also have a limited distance of boom. Most have supplemental contracts with containment companies such as A&A. The Coast Guard has 500 feet of standard boom and 100 feet of sausage boom, enough to apply a Band-Aid to a small spill, but no more.

Together, on-hand booms are NOT enough for the clean-up of a catastrophic spill. "We're looking to the government to buy several miles of boom in case of a major spill," says Rennert.

Responsibility for spills of any kind rests with the party that caused the accident, of course. "He who spills is responsible," is the Coast Guard's spillage credo according to Lt. Paul MacDonald, USCG Marine Safety Officer for Tampa. "We say let's get it cleaned up -- the responsibility can come later."

But sometimes the person or company is not immediately known or doesn't step forward. To prevent spreading or further calamity, the United States Coast Guard (USCG) will often take charge of immediate cleanup needs, hiring independent contractors to mop up. Then the Coast Guard and a wide range of other state and federal agencies will go after the offenders with fines, penalties and criminal charges.

"Port Manatee is primarily responsible for the area we call Port Manatee," according to Steve Tyndal. "We can't be held responsible for shipping in the channels. That's out of our jurisdiction.

"Naturally," he says "we have a vested interest in all the shipping channels. If there were a spill anywhere in Tampa Bay, we would be involved. We have material on hand -- and have ordered more -- to enhance our ability to handle a spill. Dave MacDonald (assistant port director) made an interesting analogy in the wake of Valdez. We were trying to decide what our response would be. He likened it to an airline crash. Is it the fault of the airline or the airport? Imagine the worst. A ship hits the Skyway. Who's at fault? Is it the pilot? The ship owner? The port? Or the people who demanded the oil in the first place?"

Tampa Bay would be easier to clean up than Prince William Sound, if you want to compare apples and oranges. For one thing, it is much smaller. And Tampa Bay doesn't have rocks like Alaska and California. It's sandy on the bay bottom and shores which is supposedly easier to handle; one expert says "you just scoop it up and take it away."

"In Alaska, they're battling 10-foot seas, impossible to clean," says MacDonald of the Coast Guard. "In the bay, we're not going to see that. Our equipment will work better. And we have warm water and warm air. If you had a spill that went on for a few days, 50 percent would evaporate. The air pollution people would be upset, but for my purposes and the water's, it would work."

Environmental Impact

No spill is a good spill, whether it be oil or phosphoric acids. Neither does the bay an ounce of positive benefit.

There are small oil spills into the waters of Tampa Bay every day, some originating with sport boat enthusiasts who splash a few ounces or gallons into the water while topping off their tanks. Authorities say that it you multiply those few ounces or gallons by the thousands of men and women using the bay for recreation annually, the enormity of minor spills becomes a major catastrophe.

The Coast Guard responds to an average of one spill a day and physically cleans up in Tampa Bay once every other month, usually less than 50 gallons. Add to that the 5 to 25 gallon spills that port authorities admit are not uncommon, throw in the rare major spill and you've got a waterway under constant attack.

Port Manatee sits between the pristine environments of the Terra Ceia and Cockroach Bay Aquatic Preserves. A spill near either would wipe out mangroves, seagrass and a major habitat of fish. McKay Bay is an important wintering area for 70 species of loons, greebs and ducks from throughout North America and familiar local breeds such as herons, spoonbills and cormorants -- a daily average usage by 25,000 birds. The birds feed and live in these waters every year and could be severely damaged by eating contaminated fish or getting toxic chemicals on their bodies. And despite heart-warming pictures in the media of waterfowl being cleaned, environmentalists say only three percent will survive an oil slick.

"The list goes on and on," says Peter Clark of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, "because our shipping channel goes right down the middle of the bay."

While refiners say the types of petroleum products commonly entering the bay such as jet fuel and kerosene are light and likely to evaporate quickly, environmentalists such as Rich Paul of the National Audobon Society believe highly refined oils are also more toxic. Not that he thinks any less of crude or bunker oil spills. "Crude oil is less toxic on the face of it but it lasts longer and it's sloppier, he says.

An example of the Coast Guard's involvement in a spill came during May when a leak developed in an acid storage container owned by GATX Terminals Corp. at the Port of Tampa. An estimated 32,000 gallons escaped from the tank and followed a drainage ditch into Kreher Basin at Hillsborough Bay. Although there was some initial confusion, the Coast Guard was called to the scene and only needed to monitor the cleanup operation. "GATX was following every (procedure) they could after the initial mess-up," according to the USCG's MacDonald. GATX employed tugboats to churn up the water near the spill, breaking up the heavy phosphoric acid which sank to the bottom of the basin. For added measure, a nearby sewage treatment plant diverted 25 million gallons of treated waste water to the basin to help dilute the acid.

Although only a few catfish died as a direct result of the GATX acid spill, that isn't a good sign at all. It reminded environmentalists that upper Hillsborough Bay and the waters of Port of Tampa are biologically dead. There were no fish there to be killed.

Despite this, charges were filed by the Coast Guard against GATX that will bring a maximum penalty of $5,000. MacDonald notes that the recreational boaters would face the same recriminations for spilling fuel into the bay. (GATX could also be subject to criminal penalties assessed by the Environmental Protection Agency of up to a $50,000 fine and five years in prison. After its most recent spill, Gardinier agreed to pay $2.1 million in penalties.)

The Coast Guard is stalking an elephant with a hot air gun; the Tampa station has a staff of 12 that is responsible for waters north from Appalachia Bay to Naples in the south.

"I'll be the first to admit we could do much better with more people," says MacDonald.

Economic Impact

Dr. Joe DeSalvo, director of the Center for Economic and Management Research at USF, authored a recent economic impact study of the Port of Tampa. His primary conclusion was that the port has a $6 billion impact on the five counties surrounding it. He, however, was at a loss to estimate the cost of a million gallon oil spill on Tampa Bay.

"I wouldn't know how to begin to quantify that," he says. "The negatives could be cutting the shrimp catch, completely eliminating sport fishing. ... Tourists (might not) want to come here because of an oil spill."

The only vaguely positive aspect for Tampa Bay would be the money paid to clean up the spill.

"If the $12 million was paid in the Tampa Bay area, it would have a positive economic impact," according to DeSalvo. But "the real question is who would pay the $12 million?"

Ripple effects of a man-made disaster could come from unexpected quarters in the event of a spill.

Even though the Exxon Valdez incident occurred thousands of miles away in Alaska, Sen. Helen Gordon Davis (D-Tampa) was outraged enough to propose a legislative amendment recommending the state government of Florida boycott Exxon. The notion didn't succeed as law, but did continue the bad publicity steamroller Exxon has had to contend with since the oil spill.

"The $841,000 we spend a year with Exxon would not have hurt them but it made a statement: the state of Florida does not deal with polluters," says Davis. "I think all governments should make a statement about all intentional polluters and their arrogance. The callousness and insensitivity of that company is unbelievable."

Davis' idea -- which may have influenced a one-day boycott of Exxon in nine states including New York and Connecticut -- is just one more example of how an environmental accident can negatively impact the bottom line. Publicity stunts are just one aspect of economic impact caused by spills.

Tampa Bay is a substantial economic as well as recreational asset to the entire region. It's a primary amenity for the local quality of life. Ships could work through a spill here, but pleasure boats couldn't. And no one would be interested in buying waterfront property where the water was oil-soaked and inky.

"The bay has a substantial economic value," says Hillsborough County Commissioner Jan Platt. "The estuary value makes it a prime nursery spot for commercial and sport fish. It would be a substantial loss to have it damaged. I think the public has awakened to the bay as a resource and it must be protected at all costs."

Corporations are learning they must be protected as well and stonewalling, hemming and hawing is no longer the way to do it. One week after Gardinier spilled 40,000 gallons of phosphatic fertilizer solution into the Alafia River in April 1988, the company hired Benito Public Relations to produce brochures, newsletters and offer public relations advice.

"Their spill -- as best as anyone can determine -- didn't cause lasting damage," according to Rod Brooker, managing director of Benito P.R. "It killed a lot of fish and crabs on the spot -- but as soon as it was dispersed by ship propellers, it was gone. It was like an electric shock -- it hits you and it's gone."

Gardinier has been responsible for at least nine "incidents" -- the company says only one was technically a spill -- ranging from 1,500 gallons to 13.8 million gallons during the past decade. "Due to this," concedes Gray Gordon, vice president of industrial relations, "we have gotten our name in a bad position. Some companies are beter at reporting (incidents) than others. We report and it's hurt us from a public relations point of view." Unlike Exxon, however, consumers cannot directly take a pound of flesh from the phosphate company by returning credit cards. "The negative publicity has not affected our sales," says Gordon. "It has hurt us in that we have to be better than industry standards (for safety)."

They can also -- and have -- made the political climate sticky for the company by pressing local, state and federal officials to keep up the heat on Gardinier. And even for a company that doesn't deal directly with the public, bad publicity is an undesirable by-product of sloppy business.

"The state is becoming more active," according to the USCG's Lt. Paul MacDonald. "We expect to see the Department of Natural Resources popping up. We've got popular opinion. It's not in the (corporations') interests to lose their product."

GATX spokesman George Lowman agrees. "Our primary business is to store and distribute product. If someone gives us a gallon, they want a gallon back. We are fully prepared to contain and clean up virtually any conceivable situation arising from the products we handle," says Lowman. "We are prepared to deal with spills that have nothing to do with our company. We will lend our people, our equipment. Speed and immediate containment is of the utmost importance and we are prepared to deal with that."

Gray Gordon of Gardinier thinks GATX could be hurt far more than would be proportionate to whatever damage it caused due to negative publicity. "It cost (GATX) fines, rebuilding, lost product, legal costs," says Gordon. "You may have people question if they want to store their product there. ... I don't think the average person conceives the power of the press. We've seen that ourselves. You can have anything happen around the bay that's worse than anything we've done. But if it says 'Gardinier,' you're fighting an uphill battle. I'm not saying we've always done everything right. But you're not going to find anyone trying harder."

Should there ever be a major oil spill in Tampa Bay of Valdez proportions, Rod Brooker says the offending company should be mindful of crossing every "t", dotting every "i" and be willing to wash its laundry in public if that's what it takes to be on the side of righteousness.

"Obviously," he says, "the effects (of a spill) would come in terms of their image, their legal standing and their finances. All would be damaged. Exxon is a company that did it all wrong. They could've handled this situation differently."

Handling the press in a disaster setting is every flack's dream and nightmare combined. They don't want it to happen, but if it does, they want the opportunity to put it in the best light. There's no higher challenge. It's like being a soldier. They don't want a war, but that's why he's there.

Notes from the Rod Brooker Book of Disaster Management (or, Lessons Learned at Exxon's Expense):

* "When you're in the middle of a disaster, everyone will listen to you. The problem is, it's under the least favorable conditions. It's highly negative.

* "Most companies do not understand the intensity of forces the company has to put on the situation. Exxon didn't. You have to immediately, intensely, focus. And timeliness. People don't understand how quickly you have to respond. The United States Coast Guard, the EPA, etc. are all saying things about you. You're trying to get steps ahead but you're already 10 steps behind.

* "You can't make a mistake. You have to do it right the first time.

* "What the smart company does is talk about what they've done to prevent it. It involves direct mailings, buying ads. In a major disaster, you have to do all those things. You have to let the public know you did the best you could to avoid a disaster, but now that it has happened, you're doing everything you can to fix it.

* "The problems would be mind-boggling. Regardless of how organized you are, you still get to the bottom line: 'What are you going to do to fix this? When will it be done? Who's going to pay for it?'

* "Sometimes you just have to say, 'I don't know.' That takes guts.

* "The best you can hope for is for the public to say, 'It was terrible but it was a freakish set of circumstances.' Get them to say, 'Well, they're good people, at least they responded well.'"

GATX spokesman George Lowman can't imagine why Exxon's public relations machinery and image went so far awry after the Valdez incident. "Exxon has a history of being very good at that -- except for Valdez. It's difficult to know what went on," he says. "Exxon is known in the business as an excellent and quality-oriented company. It is difficult to know exactly what happened in Alaska. It's a disaster of major proportions that is difficult to clean up. There will be a lot of litigation."

Lowman says GATX is always prepared for the worst to happen. But he insists the negative air around Exxon wouldn't happen to his publicly traded, New York Stock Exchange company.

"We are open, we are forthright," he says. "We will say everything we know as fact. That is company policy."

Gardinier's Gordon says he thinks every business handling toxic waste on Tampa Bay can learn from the Exxon disaster. "The amount of harm on the bay wouldn't be relative to the affect on the business," he says. "It goes a lot beyond, 'Is the customer going to buy or not buy?' It would have a terrific economic impact on the company. Hopefully, companies are looking at their tanks and facilities."

Even the best laid plans of tanker captains and oil executives will occasionally go awry. Rich Paul, manager of the National Audobon Society's Tampa Bay sanctuaries, says there's no way he can ever be confident the environment could dodge a major toxic bullet in the bay.

"This is like nuclear war, isn't it?" he asks. "It could happen. You hope it won't, but crossing your fingers doesn't help. We saw that in Alaska. The staff and the methods for containing a spill were watered down. I hope the oil spill plans for Port of Tampa and Port Manatee are being thoroughly reviewed. These things don't clean themselves up overnight."

 

SIDEBAR

Pipelines

You'd think somebody would know where all the oil pipelines are buried in the communities of Tampa Bay, but thinking and knowing are two different animals.

Take the 14-mile fuel link between Port Manatee and the FPL power plant in Parrish. It is 16 inches wide and carries a thick, heated oil described as residual oil. FPL has two 500,000 barrel storage tanks at both ends of the pipeline to supply the plant, which burns 40,000 barrels a day. The pipeline has a computer which controls pressure in the system and can shut off valves at the beginning, middle and end of the line in case of trouble. There has never been a spill or failure of the line.

That's a good thing because nobody in authority seems to know where the pipeline is or can produce a map of it. Not an FPL spokesman in Miami, not Manatee civil defense, pollution control, the fire district or sheriff's department. Each agency -- few people even knew there was a pipeline -- referred inquiries to someone else.

The same drill didn't work much better at Port Tampa, where three pipelines originate.

A subsidiary of GATX Corp., the Central Florida Pipeline Co., operates the Central Florida Pipeline from Port of Tampa to storage tanks in Taft, near Orlando International Airport. It supplies mostly gasoline and jet fuel via an eight-inch and a six-inch line buried along CSX Railroad right-of-way. There was an accident on the Central Florida Pipeline in December 1985 in the town of Lake Alfred when it was struck by construction equipment and 40,000 gallons of leaded gasoline spilled out.

Within Hillsborough County are two shorter jet fuel pipelines, both originating at the port. The Tampa Pipeline Corp. delivers jet fuel to Tampa International Airport via a 1969 underground pipeline that follows Commerce Street into Westshore Blvd. right-of-way. It is a low-pressure line, buried an average of three feet underground, sending petrol to the airport under 400 pounds pressure instead of 700-1,000 pounds. There has never been an accident on the 6-inch wide, quarter-inch thick line, which is supplied by a consortium of Shell, Chevron and Gulf BP.

A second, shorter government-owned line transports jet fuel from Port of Tampa to MacDill Air Force Base. The line is also used to supply fuel to other government agencies.

Residual oil -- a thick, gunky substances not unlike bunker oil -- is carried by pipelines in Pinellas and Manatee counties. These pipelines must be kept heated to 130 degrees to keep the oil fluid enough to move through the lines.

The Pinellas line is 14 inches wide and buried six feet below ground. It starts at the Bartow power plant and follows Florida Power right-of-way for 31 miles to its Anclote Key station, just north of Tarpon Springs. For the most part, the pipeline weaves along east and west of U.S. 19; at Pasco County it threads the Pinellas/Pasco line west to Anclote. Florida Power has only experienced one break in the line, caused by a construction mishap.

People's Gas in Hillsborough and Pinellas counties receives natural gas from its Texas suppliers entirely by pipeline. That line, owned by Florida Gas Transmission Co., enters Florida at the panhandle, comes down the center of the state then has a western spur called the "St. Petersburg Lateral" that flows from Orlando across Lakeland to Hillsborough County. In Hillsborough, the main line is buried approximately three feet underground and follows the interstate highways, goes to Pinellas through Oldsmar at the top of Tampa Bay, then closely follows U.S. 19 into St. Petersburg. The line then goes back to Hillsborough by following Gandy Blvd., crossing along the bottom of the bay.

Natural gas pipelines are much safer than oil pipelines, according to People's Gas Director of Public Affairs Scott Wilson.

"If one of those lines ruptures you don't have the chance of pollution," he says. Even with a lit match, accidents are unlikely at ground level because the mixture is too rich, according to Wilson. "You just have a gas that's lighter than air, that goes up into the atmosphere and dissipates."

 

end

 

©2000, All rights reserved. No portion may be reproduced without the express written permission of the author.


Wash Wear Smile


Free Andelmania E-Newsletter!

Want to hear the latest about the Andelmans? Join our mailing list!
You'll get updates about the family and professional news, too.
Enter your email address below, then click the 'Join List' button:
Powered by ListBot


banner


Try Link-O-Matic for instant hits!